ESTATE OF BANTA v. FOUR WALNUT CREEK POLICE OFFICERS, C 13-342 CRB. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160613a80
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Plaintiffs filed this action alleging that four Walnut Creek police officers used excessive force and acted negligently when they fatally shot Anthony Banta. See Complaint (dkt. 1). Defendants have moved for summary judgment. See Motion (dkt. 64). For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Officers Connors and G
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Plaintiffs filed this action alleging that four Walnut Creek police officers used excessive force and acted negligently when they fatally shot Anthony Banta. See Complaint (dkt. 1). Defendants have moved for summary judgment. See Motion (dkt. 64). For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Officers Connors and Gr..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL OFFICERS
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this action alleging that four Walnut Creek police officers used excessive force and acted negligently when they fatally shot Anthony Banta. See Complaint (dkt. 1). Defendants have moved for summary judgment. See Motion (dkt. 64).
For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of Officers Connors and Griffith. See Minute Entry (dkt. 76). The Court DENIES summary judgment to Officers Sugrue and Ezard given factual disputes regarding their actions and an insufficient factual basis to find that those two officers were entitled to qualified immunity.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
