Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc. v. Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings LLC, 3:16-CV-01361-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160614727 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . FOR GOOD CAUSE, the parties stipulate to modify the date of hearing on Plaintiff Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc.'s ("Smith Anderson") Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Jurisdictional Discovery (ECF No. 31). The Court scheduled the hearing on the motion for June 21, 2016. Lead counsel for Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings LLC, d/b/a Stonehedge I
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY

FOR GOOD CAUSE, the parties stipulate to modify the date of hearing on Plaintiff Smith-Anderson Enterprises, Inc.'s ("Smith Anderson") Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Jurisdictional Discovery (ECF No. 31). The Court scheduled the hearing on the motion for June 21, 2016. Lead counsel for Boston East Tyngsboro Holdings LLC, d/b/a Stonehedge Inn & Spa, Boston East India Hotels LLC, and Stonehedge Cellars LLC (the "Stonehedge Defendants"), who will be handling the hearing for the Stonehedge Defendants, had a previously scheduled commitment to be out of the country on a client matter on that date.

Counsel for Stonehedge Defendants contacted the Court's Courtroom Deputy and was told that Thursday, June 30 at 1:30 p.m. is available for a hearing. The parties are available for a hearing at that date and time. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court modify the date of hearing on Smith-Anderson's Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Jurisdictional Discovery to Thursday, June 30.

Prior to this stipulation, the parties have made the following stipulated requests for time modifications, all of which have been granted by the Court: (1) extending time for Benchmark Wine Group, Inc. to respond to the complaint by 10 days after the Court rules on the Stonehedge Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 29); (2) extending time for Smith-Anderson to respond to the Stonehedge Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by seven days (ECF No. 33); and (4) modifying the briefing schedule on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)

I attest that I have obtained concurrence to file this stipulation from counsel for Plaintiff Smith-Andersons.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing date on Smith Anderson") Motion for Leave to Conduct Expedited Jurisdictional Discovery shall be on Thursday, June 30 at 1:30 p.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer