YANG v. KIM, C 15-04986 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160616a43
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court refuses to enter the proposed consent decree because the parties cannot agree on its import. The Court will entertain a motion for attorney's fees but the Court will not accept jurisdiction over attorney's fees in the state court matter since it does not appear that both sides are willing to waive any rights to appeal an order on attorney's fees. Rule 54(d)(2)(D) permits the Court to refer issues related to at
Summary: ORDER DENYING PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court refuses to enter the proposed consent decree because the parties cannot agree on its import. The Court will entertain a motion for attorney's fees but the Court will not accept jurisdiction over attorney's fees in the state court matter since it does not appear that both sides are willing to waive any rights to appeal an order on attorney's fees. Rule 54(d)(2)(D) permits the Court to refer issues related to att..
More
ORDER DENYING PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court refuses to enter the proposed consent decree because the parties cannot agree on its import. The Court will entertain a motion for attorney's fees but the Court will not accept jurisdiction over attorney's fees in the state court matter since it does not appear that both sides are willing to waive any rights to appeal an order on attorney's fees.
Rule 54(d)(2)(D) permits the Court to refer issues related to attorney's fees to a special master. Rule 53(g)(3) allows the Court to allocate the compensation of the special master among the parties.
Plaintiff shall file any motion for attorney's fees by JUNE 30, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
