Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SCHWARTZ EX REL. STORAGE v. VASUDEVAN, 5:16-CV-00892-YGR. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160616b05 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER CONSOLIDATING DERIVATIVE ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS, AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . WHEREAS, there are presently two shareholder derivative actions currently pending in this district against the Individual Defendants, 1 who are certain current and former directors and officers of nominal defendant Nimble Storage, Inc. ("Nimble") (Nimble, together with the Individual Defendants, being collectivel
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING DERIVATIVE ACTIONS, APPOINTING LEAD COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS, AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS

WHEREAS, there are presently two shareholder derivative actions currently pending in this district against the Individual Defendants,1 who are certain current and former directors and officers of nominal defendant Nimble Storage, Inc. ("Nimble") (Nimble, together with the Individual Defendants, being collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"): Schwartz v. Vasudevan, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-00892-YGR; and Goldstein v. Vasudevan, et al., Case No. 5:16-CV-02238-YGR (together, the "Derivative Actions");

WHEREAS, three putative class actions alleging violations of the federal securities laws filed against Nimble and certain Nimble officers were also filed and are pending in this district: Vikramkumar v. Nimble Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:15-cv-05803-YGR; Guardino v. Nimble Storage, Inc., et al, Case No. 3:15-cv-05991-YGR; and Madhani v. Nimble Storage, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:16-cv-00629-YGR (collectively, "the Securities Class Action");

WHEREAS, on March 28, 2016, the Court entered an "Order Granting Arkansas Teacher Retirement System's Motion for Consolidation, Appointment as Lead Plaintiff, and Approval of Selection of Counsel" (Doc. No. 69);

WHEREAS, on May 12, 2016, the Court entered a Related Case Order in the Securities Class Action (Doc. No. 84), relating and reassigning the Schwartz Action and the Securities Class Action to this Court;

WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Court entered a Related Case Order in the Securities Class Action (Doc. No. 88), relating and reassigning the Goldstein Action and the Securities Class Action to this Court;

WHEREAS, while the Derivative Actions assert different claims for liability, they involve some of the same parties and factual allegations as the Securities Class Action;

WHEREAS, defendants named in the Securities Class Action plan to file a motion to dismiss the Securities Class Action;

WHEREAS, in an effort to assure consistent rulings and decisions and the avoidance of unnecessary duplication of effort, the undersigned counsel for the parties submit this renewed stipulation to consolidate the Derivative Actions;

WHEREAS, Johnson & Weaver, LLP and Lifshitz & Miller seek to be designated as Lead Counsel in the Derivative Actions, once consolidated, and Defendants take no position with respect to such designation; and

WHEREAS, based upon the circumstances unique to this case, and to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of judicial resources before resolution of the anticipated motion to dismiss the Securities Class Action, the parties to this action have further agreed, subject to this Court's approval, to stay the consolidated action, including motions practice and discovery, in a manner substantially similar to the Order Regarding Response to Complaint and Stay of Litigation entered in the Schwartz Action on April 20, 2016.

WHEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree, stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as follows:

1. The following actions shall be consolidated for all purposes, including pre-trial proceedings and trial, into one action (the "Consolidated Derivative Action"):2

Case Name Case No. Filing Date Schwartz v. Vasudevan, et al. 5:16-CV-00892-YGR February 23, 2016 Goldstein v. Vasudevan, et al. 5:16-CV-02238-YGR April 26, 2016

2. Every pleading filed in the Consolidated Derivative Action, or in any separate action included herein, must bear the following caption:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE NIMBLE STORAGE, INC. Lead Case No.: 5:16-cv-00892-YGR DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, (Derivative Action) This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

3. The files of the Consolidated Derivative Action will be maintained in one file under Lead Case No.: 5:16-cv-00892-YGR.

4. Lead Counsel for plaintiffs for the conduct of the Consolidated Derivative Action is designated as follows:

JOHNSON & WEAVER, LLP FRANK J. JOHNSON 600 West Broadway, Suite 1540 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 230-0063 Facsimile: (619) 255-1856 -and- LIFSHITZ & MILLER JOSHUA M. LIFSHITZ 821 Franklin Ave., Suite 209 Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: (516) 493-9780 Facsimile: (516) 280-7376

5. The parties agree that plaintiffs' Lead Counsel has authority to speak for plaintiffs in matters regarding pre-trial procedure, trial, and settlement negotiations and shall make all work assignments in such manner as to facilitate the orderly and efficient prosecution of this litigation and to avoid duplicative or unproductive effort.

6. The parties agree that plaintiffs' Lead Counsel will be responsible for coordinating all activities and appearances on behalf of plaintiffs and for the dissemination of notices and orders of this Court. The parties further agree that no motion, request for discovery, or other pre-trial or trial proceedings will be initiated or filed by any plaintiffs except through plaintiffs' Lead Counsel.

7. The parties agree that Defendants' counsel may rely upon all agreements made with plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, or other duly authorized representative of plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, and such agreements will be binding on plaintiffs.

8. This Order shall apply to each purported derivative action arising out of the same or substantially the same transactions or events as the Nimble Derivative Actions, which is subsequently filed in, removed to, or transferred to this Court.

9. When a case that properly belongs as part of the Consolidated Derivative Action is hereafter filed in this Court or transferred here from another court, counsel shall promptly call to the attention of the Clerk of the Court the filing or transfer of any case that might properly be consolidated as part of the Consolidated Derivative Action.

10. The parties agree to stay the Consolidated Derivative Action until the earlier of either of the following events: (i) the Securities Class Action is dismissed with prejudice; or (ii) Defendants file an answer in the Securities Class Action.

11. Defendants shall have no obligation to respond to the complaints filed in either of the Derivative Actions so long as the case remains stayed.

12. In the event that any discovery is provided or produced by Defendants to plaintiffs in any related derivative action purportedly brought on behalf of Nimble arising from similar facts as the instant action, Defendants will at or about the same time notice plaintiffs and provide copies of that discovery to plaintiffs in the Consolidated Derivative Action, provided that the parties have executed and the Court has entered a protective order.

13. Plaintiffs will have thirty (30) days from when the Securities Class Action is dismissed with prejudice or Defendants file an answer in the Securities Class Action to enter into a stipulation with Defendants and/or seek leave to file an amended derivative complaint or, in the alternative, designate an operative complaint. Defendants will answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the amended derivative complaint or the designated operative complaint as the case may be within forty-five (45) days after plaintiffs file an amended derivative complaint or designate an operative complaint.

14. Defendants shall notify Lead Counsel for plaintiffs in the Consolidated Derivative Action of any formal settlement meetings, mediations, or settlement conferences that might be held in any currently filed, subsequently filed, or threatened derivative actions that are based on the same or substantially similar allegations as made in the Consolidated Derivative Action.

15. By entering into this stipulation, the parties do not waive any rights or defenses, procedural or otherwise, not specifically addressed herein, and reserve their respective rights to file any application, request or motion with the Court they deem appropriate once this case is no longer deferred.

16. At any time during which the prosecution of this Consolidated Derivative Action is stayed pursuant to the Order, any party may file a motion with the Court seeking to modify the terms of the Order, which may be opposed by any other party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Temporarily Deferring Prosecution of Derivative Action. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The "Individual Defendants" include Suresh Vasudevan, Varun Mehta, Frank Calderoni, James J. Goetz, William D. Jenkins, Jr., Jerry M. Kennelly, Ping Li, William J. Schroeder, Anup V. Singh, Daniel T. Leary, and Umesh Maheshwari.
2. For clarity, the Securities Class Action should not be consolidated with the Derivative Actions. While the actions are related under Civil Local Rule 3-12, they are not suitable for consolidation because, among other reasons, the Securities Class Action alleges violations of the federal securities laws against Nimble, whereas the Derivative Actions bring claims purportedly on behalf of Nimble.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer