TWITTER, INC. v. LYNCH, 14-cv-04480-YGR. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160620699
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint on May 24, 2016. (Dkt. No. 114.) On June 13, 2016, Defendants filed a request for a summary judgment pre-filing conference as well as an Administrative Motion for Extension of Time to File a response to the Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 115, 116.) The Court DENIES
Summary: ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint on May 24, 2016. (Dkt. No. 114.) On June 13, 2016, Defendants filed a request for a summary judgment pre-filing conference as well as an Administrative Motion for Extension of Time to File a response to the Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 115, 116.) The Court DENIES t..
More
ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT'S REQUEST FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint on May 24, 2016. (Dkt. No. 114.) On June 13, 2016, Defendants filed a request for a summary judgment pre-filing conference as well as an Administrative Motion for Extension of Time to File a response to the Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 115, 116.)
The Court DENIES the request for a summary judgment pre-filing conference. Defendants have offered no legal authority or argument suggesting that permitting them to file a motion under Rule 56 at this juncture in this case—prior to any responsive pleading, a Rule 16 scheduling conference, and an opportunity for discovery—would be appropriate.
Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File a response the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants shall file any motion to dismiss or answer no later than July 5, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
