Filed: Jun. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . WHEREAS, following the May 18, 2016, settlement discussions at the U.S. District Court before Howard Herman, Director of the Court's ADR Program, Plaintiffs and Defendants California Department of Transportation and Malcolm Dougherty ("Caltrans") have exchanged proposed settlement agreements, as previously agreed to by the parties and as reflected in their pre
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . WHEREAS, following the May 18, 2016, settlement discussions at the U.S. District Court before Howard Herman, Director of the Court's ADR Program, Plaintiffs and Defendants California Department of Transportation and Malcolm Dougherty ("Caltrans") have exchanged proposed settlement agreements, as previously agreed to by the parties and as reflected in their prev..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
WHEREAS, following the May 18, 2016, settlement discussions at the U.S. District Court before Howard Herman, Director of the Court's ADR Program, Plaintiffs and Defendants California Department of Transportation and Malcolm Dougherty ("Caltrans") have exchanged proposed settlement agreements, as previously agreed to by the parties and as reflected in their previous stipulation submitted to this Court (ECF 50);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Caltrans agree that the settlement discussions have been productive to date and that further settlement discussions would be worthwhile, and have agreed to such discussions continuing, and possible subsequent settlement meetings as warranted;
WHEREAS, to help facilitate these additional settlement discussions, Plaintiffs and Caltrans agree that an additional short extension of the date for lodging the administrative records in this action is appropriate;
WHEREAS, the requested extension of time for the record will not necessitate any other changes to the current case schedule, which next presents a case management conference on July 8, 2016;
NOW THEREFORE, by and through their undersigned counsel, the parties do hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The date for lodging the administrative records in this action, currently set for June 27, 2016 (ECF 50), shall be extended to July 7, 2016, and any motion to extend that deadline further shall be filed by June 24, 2016.
2. The date for motions regarding disputes over the contents of the administrative records, currently set for July 11 (ECF 51), shall be extended to July 25, 2016.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the case schedule in this matter is hereby amended as follows:
1. The administrative records in this action shall be lodged by July 7, 2016, and any motions to extend that deadline shall be filed by June 24, 2016.
2. Any motions regarding disputes over the contents of the administrative records shall be filed by July 25, 2016.
3. In light of the pending motion to dismiss, the Court continues the case management conference from July 8, 2016 to August 12, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. A joint case management statement shall be due by August 5, 2016. If any party believes a ruling on the motion would facilitate settlement discussions, that
IT IS SO ORDERED. party shall file a notice to that effect by July 1, 2016.
