WEISBERG v. STRIPE, INC., 16-cv-00584-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160622908
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF No. 21 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 21. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for June 30, 2016, is hereby VACATED. If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from t
Summary: ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF No. 21 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 21. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for June 30, 2016, is hereby VACATED. If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from th..
More
ORDER VACATING HEARING
Re: ECF No. 21
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 21. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for June 30, 2016, is hereby VACATED.
If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the Court's calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
In light of this order, the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for June 30, 2016, is hereby continued to July 27, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
