B & R SUPERMARKET, INC. v. VISA, INC., C 16-01150 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160622924
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2016
Summary: QUESTIONS FOR JUNE 23 HEARING WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . For our hearing on Thursday, June 23, what does the record tell us on the following questions: 1. Before the Liability Shift, was the decision to make merchants liable for the charge backs made by the issuing bank What was the role of the Network in deciding whether to make merchants liable for a charge back 2. Same questions for after the Liability Shift. 3. How does the issuing bank even know that the mag-strip transactio
Summary: QUESTIONS FOR JUNE 23 HEARING WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . For our hearing on Thursday, June 23, what does the record tell us on the following questions: 1. Before the Liability Shift, was the decision to make merchants liable for the charge backs made by the issuing bank What was the role of the Network in deciding whether to make merchants liable for a charge back 2. Same questions for after the Liability Shift. 3. How does the issuing bank even know that the mag-strip transaction..
More
QUESTIONS FOR JUNE 23 HEARING
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
For our hearing on Thursday, June 23, what does the record tell us on the following questions:
1. Before the Liability Shift, was the decision to make merchants liable for the charge backs made by the issuing bank? What was the role of the Network in deciding whether to make merchants liable for a charge back?
2. Same questions for after the Liability Shift.
3. How does the issuing bank even know that the mag-strip transaction was on an EMV card and that the Network had not yet certified the merchant equipment?
Time will be short.
Source: Leagle
