PAPST LICENSING GmbH & CO. KG v. HP INC., 16-cv-00575-JD. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160624877
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 70. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 30 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no cer
Summary: ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 70. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 30 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no cert..
More
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 70. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 30 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no certification is filed, the dismissal will be with prejudice as of that time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
