Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McLaughlin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 3:15-cv-02904-WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160706a71 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2016
Summary: CORRECTED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER TO RESET CERTAIN DEADLINES; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Latasha McLaughlin and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, under the Court's Notice [Dkt. 17], the parties were precluded from discussing a class settlement until the Court ruled on class certification; WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, the Court issued an order certifying tw
More

CORRECTED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER TO RESET CERTAIN DEADLINES; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Latasha McLaughlin and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, under the Court's Notice [Dkt. 17], the parties were precluded from discussing a class settlement until the Court ruled on class certification;

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016, the Court issued an order certifying two classes under TILA [Dkt. 123] and set deadlines of July 12, 2016 for a joint notice plan to be submitted to the court, and to plan to distribute class notice by July 28, 2016;

WHEREAS, the litigation to date has largely joined the merits and class certification issues, and framed the parties' positions. Therefore following the Court's ruling on class certification, which opened the door to engage in settlement discussions, the parties promptly began negotiations and held a telephone settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Ryu on June 30, 2016;

WHEREAS, the parties will attend an in-person mediation with Magistrate Judge Ryu on August 5, 2016 at 10:00 am;

WHEREAS, the Court's Scheduling Order [Dkt. 37], issued in October 2015, originally set a class certification hearing for February 2016 and discovery deadlines in August 2016. The Order thus contemplated approximately 6 months from the issuance of an order on class certification until the discovery cutoff, for the parties to discuss a class resolution. Because class certification was not ruled on until June 22, 2016, however, the time available for the parties to meaningfully discuss resolution is now substantially shorter.

WHEREAS, the parties are presently engaging in good faith settlement discussions and mutually seek to focus their respective resources on timely reaching a class resolution; THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Wells Fargo hereby agree as follows:

1. Class Notice: a. To extend the deadline to submit a joint proposal for class notification from Tuesday, July 12, 2016 to Tuesday, August 23, 2016; b. To extend the target date to distribute notice from Thursday, July 28, 2016 to Thursday, September 8, 2016. 2. Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment: a. Wells Fargo's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 65] shall be set for hearing on November 3, 2016; b. Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed by September 29, 2016; c. Wells Fargo's Reply shall be filed by October 13, 2016. 3. Other Pretrial Deadlines: a. The non-expert discovery cut-off shall be continued from Wednesday, August 31, 2016 to Wednesday, September 28, 2016; b. The expert deadlines set in paragraph 5 of the Court's Scheduling Order [Dkt. 37] shall be continued by 28 days, such that the last date for designation of expert testimony and disclosure of expert reports on issues where a party has the burden of proof shall be continued from August 31, 2016 to September 28, 2016. Opposition and reply report deadlines, expert discovery cutoff, and other deadlines in Paragraphs 5 and 6 (damages studies) of the Scheduling Order are triggered off the September 28, 2016 opening report date as indicated in the Court's Scheduling Order; c. The remaining dates in the Court's Scheduling Order, including the September 29 deadline to file dispositive motions; November 3, 2016 deadline to hear dispositive motions, November 30, 2016 pretrial conference, and December 5, 2016 trial date, remain as set by the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer