Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SLACK v. BURNS, 13-cv-05001-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160707i61 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL Docket Nos. 292, 303. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Previously, the Court deferred ruling in part on Plaintiffs' motions to file under seal, see Docket Nos. 292, 303 (motions), so that third parties could provide a declaration, either justifying the confidentiality designation or waiving such designation. See Docket no. 314, 315 (orders). The Court has now received a declaration from Amalgamated Bank ("AB"). See Docket No. 319 (Fre
More

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Docket Nos. 292, 303.

Previously, the Court deferred ruling in part on Plaintiffs' motions to file under seal, see Docket Nos. 292, 303 (motions), so that third parties could provide a declaration, either justifying the confidentiality designation or waiving such designation. See Docket no. 314, 315 (orders).

The Court has now received a declaration from Amalgamated Bank ("AB"). See Docket No. 319 (Freel declaration). The declaration provides a basis for sealing Exhibits XXX and YYY to the Leviant reply declaration, see Docket No. 303-4 (Leviant reply declaration), and Exhibits 7 and 9-11 to the McKenzie declaration. See Docket No. 292-4 (McKenzie declaration).

Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to seal those exhibits.

The Court did not receive a declaration from IPS. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the motion to seal Exhibit VVV to the Leviant reply declaration.

This order along with the orders at Docket Nos. 314 and 315 dispose of Docket Nos. 292 and 303.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer