Filed: Jul. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES: Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST, Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST, Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and seek leave from the Court to continue
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES: Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST, Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST, Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and seek leave from the Court to continue P..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT TWITTER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES: Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST, Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST, Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST.
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 6-2, Plaintiffs and Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate and seek leave from the Court to continue Plaintiffs' deadline to file and serve their Opposition to Twitter's Motion for Summary Judgment as well as Twitter's Reply deadline and this Court's hearing on the Motion.
The Parties hereby stipulate to continue the briefing schedule for Twitter's Motion (ECF No. 725) as follows:
EVENT DEADLINE
Plaintiff's Opposition Brief August 11, 2016
Twitter's Reply Brief September 8, 2016
Hearing on Motion September 22, 2016
The reason for the Parties' request is that they are engaged in discovery-related conversations that Plaintiffs contend are relevant to Twitter's pending Motion for Summary Judgment.
ATTESTATION
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories listed above.
Dated: July 5, 2016 /s/Conor H. Kennedy
____________________
Conor H. Kennedy
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The stipulation between Plaintiffs and Defendants Twitter, Inc. regarding timing of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant Twitter, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, to be scheduled as follows:
EVENT DEADLINE
Plaintiff's Opposition Brief August 11, 2016
Twitter's Reply Brief September 8, 2016
Hearing on Motion September 22, 2016
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
