Tindle v. City of Daly City, 3:13-cv-02449-HSG (DMR). (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160713b77
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO SET THE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 169 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court is in receipt of Defendants' request for a one-week extension to file the deposition schedule that was due today, July 12, 2016. [Docket No. 169.] The Defendants did not file a proposed order with this request. By 9:00 a.m. on July 13, 2016, the Defendants shall file a detailed proposed order setting forth their proposed process for setting the depositi
Summary: ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO SET THE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 169 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court is in receipt of Defendants' request for a one-week extension to file the deposition schedule that was due today, July 12, 2016. [Docket No. 169.] The Defendants did not file a proposed order with this request. By 9:00 a.m. on July 13, 2016, the Defendants shall file a detailed proposed order setting forth their proposed process for setting the depositio..
More
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO SET THE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. No. 169
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
The court is in receipt of Defendants' request for a one-week extension to file the deposition schedule that was due today, July 12, 2016. [Docket No. 169.] The Defendants did not file a proposed order with this request. By 9:00 a.m. on July 13, 2016, the Defendants shall file a detailed proposed order setting forth their proposed process for setting the deposition schedule for this case, including a process for communicating directly with Plaintiff Sahleem Tindle to schedule his deposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
