Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NASSERI v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 3:15-cv-04001-WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160720845 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fariba Nasseri ("Plaintiff") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and request that the above-captioned matter be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to the parties' agreement in this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. ECF CERTIFICAT
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Fariba Nasseri ("Plaintiff") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and request that the above-captioned matter be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to the parties' agreement in this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ECF CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from all of the above signatories to the document.

ORDER ON STIPULATION

Pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal executed by the parties and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

• The above entitled action is dismissed with prejudice; • Each party shall bear their owns fees and costs; and • The Court shall close its file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer