Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robern, Inc. v. Shine Bathrooms, Inc., 5-16-cv-00133-RMW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160720872 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2016
Summary: DEFENDANT SHINE BATHROOMS, INC.'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE JULY 26, 2016 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Settlement Conference Standing Order, Defendant Shine Bathrooms, Inc. hereby requests a continuance of the July 26, 2016 settlement conference, subject to approval of the Court, based on the following: Counsel for Defendant Shine Bathrooms, Inc., Trinh Law, filed earlier today: 1) Motion By Trinh Law to Withdraw As
More

DEFENDANT SHINE BATHROOMS, INC.'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE JULY 26, 2016 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to the Court's Settlement Conference Standing Order, Defendant Shine Bathrooms, Inc. hereby requests a continuance of the July 26, 2016 settlement conference, subject to approval of the Court, based on the following:

Counsel for Defendant Shine Bathrooms, Inc., Trinh Law, filed earlier today: 1) Motion By Trinh Law to Withdraw As Counsel For Shine Bathrooms, Inc. (Dkt. No. 34) and 2) Ex-Parte Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Motion by Trinh Law to Withdraw As Counsel For Shine Bathrooms, Inc. (Dkt. No. 35) (collectively, "Pending Motions") because circumstances and a breakdown of the attorney-client relationship has occurred which has made it impossible for Trinh Law to continue to adequately and properly represent Shine Bathrooms, Inc.

The parties are currently scheduled for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on July 26, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. (Dkt. No. 33).

Counsel for the parties met and conferred on July 18, 2016 and discussed a continuance of the settlement conference given the two pending motions before the Court. Robern does not oppose Shine Bathrooms, Inc.'s request for a continuance provided that Shine Bathrooms, Inc. reimburses Robern for any nonrefundable travel costs incurred in connection with the July 26, 2016 settlement conference.

The parties agree that the settlement conference should be rescheduled as soon as practical once the Court has decided the Pending Motions. Respectfully submitted,

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that the concurrence in the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from Kadie M. Jelenchick, counsel for Robern, Inc.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer