EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs iCORE Global, LLC ("iCORE") and Samantha Mueting (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Millennium Commercial Advisors, LLC ("Millennium"), Avison Young (Canada) Inc. ("Avison Young (Canada)"), Avison Young (USA) Inc. ("Avison Young (USA)"), Avison Young — Northern California, Ltd. ("Avison Young — Northern California"), Alec Wynne ("Wynne"), and Justin Rayburn ("Rayburn") (collectively, "Defendants") submit their Joint Case Management Conference Statement.
1. The Court granted Defendants' Motion to Stay ("Order on the Motion to Stay") on January 14, 2015 pending the Colorado trial court issuing an order on the question of the enforceability of the forum selection clauses in the iCORE contracts. (Dkt. No. 50)
2. On January 15, 2015, the Court reset the Case Management Conference from February 26, 2015 to June 11, 2015. (Dkt. No. 51)
3. On June 8, 2015, the Court reset the Case Management Conference for October 22, 2015. (Dkt. No. 53)
4. On September 2, 2015, the Court reset the Case Management Conference for November 9, 2015. (Dkt. No. 56)
5. On September 23, 2015, a status conference was held in the Colorado state court case. The state court scheduled an evidentiary hearing regarding the remanded issue for November 24, 2015. The parties were to submit written argument following the hearing after which the Colorado state court will decide the remanded issue.
6. In light of the Colorado state court's scheduling of the evidentiary hearing for November 24, 2015, this Court reset the Case Management Conference for February 11, 2016. (Dkt. No. 58)
7. On February 8, 2016, the Court reset the Case Management Conference for April 14, 2016 (Dkt. 61), on March 16, 2016, the Court reset the Case Management Conference for April 12, 2016 (Dkt. 62), and on April 8, 2016, the Court reset the Case Management Conference for July 21, 2016. (Dkt. 64)
Colorado counsel has advised parties that the evidentiary hearing in the Colorado action has now been continued to August 30, 2016, a date confirmed by the parties and their counsel. The parties are agreeable to resetting the date of the Case Management Conference to accommodate the conclusion of the pending motion in the Colorado action. The parties to the Colorado action are no longer planning to file separate written submissions following the hearing. Resetting the date of the Case Management Conference will not have an adverse effect on the case schedule in this action as the case is currently stayed.