Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BARNES v. ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., 16-cv-00477-EMC (LB). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160721858 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2016
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . The parties called the court with a discovery dispute about the scope of the deposition of ERI's CEO Joel Gay. The plaintiff wants to ask Mr. Gay about the circumstances surrounding the departure of ERI's former CEO Thomas Rooney, who left the company in January 2015. ERI and Mr. Rooney's counsel resist the questioning as irrelevant to this lawsuit, harassing, and possibly based on the ulterior purpose of getting discovery for the related s
More

DISCOVERY ORDER

The parties called the court with a discovery dispute about the scope of the deposition of ERI's CEO Joel Gay. The plaintiff wants to ask Mr. Gay about the circumstances surrounding the departure of ERI's former CEO Thomas Rooney, who left the company in January 2015. ERI and Mr. Rooney's counsel resist the questioning as irrelevant to this lawsuit, harassing, and possibly based on the ulterior purpose of getting discovery for the related securities action.

The court orders the following. The plaintiff may depose Mr. Gay about Mr. Rooney's alleged misrepresentations to the plaintiff and similar (alleged) misrepresentations to the public (whether to the "market," analysts, or the press) and internally at ERI. (See Complaint — ECF No. 34, ¶¶ 10-15, 18-24.) He also may ask about whether these alleged misrepresentations factored into Mr. Rooney's ending his employment with ERI. The discovery is allowed to facilitate the upcoming mediation on July 28 and (with the parties' agreement) is designated confidential under the protective order absent stipulation of the parties or further order of the court. The court allows some flexibility in questioning but expects the questioning to be tethered to the representations made to Mr. Barnes before and during his employment at ERI, whether Mr. Rooney made those representations elsewhere (whether to the public or internally in the company), and whether those representations factored into Mr. Rooney's separation from ERI.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer