CROCKETT v. BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, 15-cv-2009-PJH. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160721910
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties having entered into a settlement agreement on April 4, 2016; and the settlement agreement having been placed on the record by the court; and plaintiff having agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice, but no separate stipulation of dismissal having been filed; and mail sent to plaintiff at his address of record on April 5, 2016, having been returned to the court on April 18, 2016, as undeliverable; and plaintiff having fa
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties having entered into a settlement agreement on April 4, 2016; and the settlement agreement having been placed on the record by the court; and plaintiff having agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice, but no separate stipulation of dismissal having been filed; and mail sent to plaintiff at his address of record on April 5, 2016, having been returned to the court on April 18, 2016, as undeliverable; and plaintiff having fai..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The parties having entered into a settlement agreement on April 4, 2016; and the settlement agreement having been placed on the record by the court; and plaintiff having agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice, but no separate stipulation of dismissal having been filed; and mail sent to plaintiff at his address of record on April 5, 2016, having been returned to the court on April 18, 2016, as undeliverable; and plaintiff having failed to notify the court of his current address within 60 days of the date the mail was returned, as required by Civil Local Rule 3-11(b), the court hereby ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
