Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DYTCH v. PORTUMEX RESTURANT, INC., 16-cv-02934. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160727c16 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MARIA DEL ROSARIO MOURA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Albert Dytch ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant. Maria Del Rosario Moura ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant may have to and including August 12, 2016 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extensio
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MARIA DEL ROSARIO MOURA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Albert Dytch ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant. Maria Del Rosario Moura ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant may have to and including August 12, 2016 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extension of time does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, including the deadline by which the joint site inspection must take place.

Signature Attestation

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document had been obtained from each the other signatories whose signatures are indicated by a conformed signature ("/s/") within this e-filed document.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer