SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC., 3:13-cv-02965-MMC (DMR). (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160728937
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT LETTER BRIEF (DKT. NO. 803) TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS OUT OF TIME DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The Court has received and considered the parties' joint letter brief (Dkt. No. 803), wherein the parties' jointly request that the Court permit limited depositions to go forward after the patent fact discovery deadline. After considering the parties' joint submission, the Court finds good cause to grant the parties' motion. In accordance with Local Rul
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT LETTER BRIEF (DKT. NO. 803) TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS OUT OF TIME DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The Court has received and considered the parties' joint letter brief (Dkt. No. 803), wherein the parties' jointly request that the Court permit limited depositions to go forward after the patent fact discovery deadline. After considering the parties' joint submission, the Court finds good cause to grant the parties' motion. In accordance with Local Rule..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' JOINT LETTER BRIEF (DKT. NO. 803) TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS OUT OF TIME
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has received and considered the parties' joint letter brief (Dkt. No. 803), wherein the parties' jointly request that the Court permit limited depositions to go forward after the patent fact discovery deadline. After considering the parties' joint submission, the Court finds good cause to grant the parties' motion.
In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT.
(1) ATopTech is permitted to take the continued deposition of Mr. James Luo; and
(2) Synopsys is permitted the additional corporate witness(es) designated by ATopTech for up to a total of two (2) hours on facts relating a particular patent license with a company called Golden Gate Technology, Inc. and facts supporting ATopTech's license defense.
IT SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
