PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING & ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC. v. SUNBELT RENTALS, INC., 16-cv-01080-VC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160728960
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER IN ADVANCE OF ORAL ARGUMENT VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . At tomorrow's hearing, the parties should be prepared to answer the following questions: 1. If the Court decides to sever Progressive Lighting's claims and In & Out Welders' claims, would the Court have discretion to transfer either or both cases to judicial districts other than the districts sought in Sunbelt Rentals' motion If so: 2. To what district does In & Out Welders believe its case should be transferred 3. To
Summary: ORDER IN ADVANCE OF ORAL ARGUMENT VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . At tomorrow's hearing, the parties should be prepared to answer the following questions: 1. If the Court decides to sever Progressive Lighting's claims and In & Out Welders' claims, would the Court have discretion to transfer either or both cases to judicial districts other than the districts sought in Sunbelt Rentals' motion If so: 2. To what district does In & Out Welders believe its case should be transferred 3. To w..
More
ORDER IN ADVANCE OF ORAL ARGUMENT
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
At tomorrow's hearing, the parties should be prepared to answer the following questions:
1. If the Court decides to sever Progressive Lighting's claims and In & Out Welders' claims, would the Court have discretion to transfer either or both cases to judicial districts other than the districts sought in Sunbelt Rentals' motion? If so:
2. To what district does In & Out Welders believe its case should be transferred?
3. To what district does Progressive Lighting believe its case should be transferred? Should the case be transferred to the Central or Southern District of California?
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
