Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

INGALLS v. SPOTIFY USA, INC., C 16-03533 WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160729854 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY STEPHEN M. RUMMAGE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney Stephen M. Rummage (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Fillin
More

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY STEPHEN M. RUMMAGE

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Stephen M. Rummage (Dkt. No. 19) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar" (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as "the bar of Washington State" — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer