Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO INTERVENE [LOCAL RULE 6-2] WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS Plaintiffs B&R Supermarket, Inc., d/b/a Milam's Market, Grove Liquors LLC, Strouk Group LLC, d/b/a Monsieur Marcel, rue21, Inc., and Palero Food Corp. and Cagueyes Food Corp., d/b/a Fine Fare Supermarket filed an Amended Complaint and a Motion to Intervene in this action on July 15, 2016, pursu
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO INTERVENE [LOCAL RULE 6-2] WILLIAM H. ALSUP , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS Plaintiffs B&R Supermarket, Inc., d/b/a Milam's Market, Grove Liquors LLC, Strouk Group LLC, d/b/a Monsieur Marcel, rue21, Inc., and Palero Food Corp. and Cagueyes Food Corp., d/b/a Fine Fare Supermarket filed an Amended Complaint and a Motion to Intervene in this action on July 15, 2016, pursua..
More
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO INTERVENE [LOCAL RULE 6-2]
WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge.
STIPULATION
WHEREAS Plaintiffs B&R Supermarket, Inc., d/b/a Milam's Market, Grove Liquors LLC, Strouk Group LLC, d/b/a Monsieur Marcel, rue21, Inc., and Palero Food Corp. and Cagueyes Food Corp., d/b/a Fine Fare Supermarket filed an Amended Complaint and a Motion to Intervene in this action on July 15, 2016, pursuant to this Court's June 24, 2016 Order;
WHEREAS Plaintiffs' Motion to Intervene is set for hearing on September 22, 2016, and Defendants' responses to the Motion to Intervene would be due on July 29, 2016 pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a);
WHEREAS Defendants' responses to the Amended Complaint are due on August 5, 2016 pursuant to this Court's June 24, 2016 Order;
WHEREAS the parties agree that efficiency and judicial economy would be served by setting the hearing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for the same hearing date — September 22, 2016 — as Plaintiffs' already-scheduled Motion to Intervene, and by briefing those motions on the same schedule;
WHEREAS the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the original Complaint, extending the deadline by 19 days from the original due date for the earliest-served defendant.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree on the following briefing schedule:
Defendants shall have an extension of seven days, until August 5, 2016, to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Intervene, and shall file such responses along with their Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint on the schedule set by the Court in its June 24, 2016 Order.
Plaintiffs shall have an extension of four days, until August 23, 2016, to oppose Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, and to submit their reply in support of their Motion to Intervene.
Defendants shall have an extension of three days, until September 2, 2016, to submit replies in support of their Motions to Dismiss.
Plaintiffs' Motion to Intervene and Defendants' motions to dismiss shall be heard on September 22, 2016 at 8:00 a.m. or at such other time as is convenient for the Court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, through counsel of record.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
