RIOJAS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 15-cv-03592-JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160729881
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT Re: ECF No. 52 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On June 30, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and denied Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 52. The Court orders Plaintiff to submit a proposed form of judgment within seven days of the filing date of this order. Defendants will then have seven days from the receipt of the proposed judgment to either approve it as to form or file their objections. Plaintiff may th
Summary: ORDER RE: PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT Re: ECF No. 52 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . On June 30, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and denied Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 52. The Court orders Plaintiff to submit a proposed form of judgment within seven days of the filing date of this order. Defendants will then have seven days from the receipt of the proposed judgment to either approve it as to form or file their objections. Plaintiff may the..
More
ORDER RE: PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT
Re: ECF No. 52
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
On June 30, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and denied Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 52. The Court orders Plaintiff to submit a proposed form of judgment within seven days of the filing date of this order. Defendants will then have seven days from the receipt of the proposed judgment to either approve it as to form or file their objections. Plaintiff may then file a response to Defendant's objections, if any, within seven days after Defendant's objections are filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
