WASHINGTON v. KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC., 15-cv-04528-KAW (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160729907
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On July 26, 2016, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as required by the Court's Standing Order. ( See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order 11.) Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration stating that the proposed orde
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On July 26, 2016, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as required by the Court's Standing Order. ( See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order 11.) Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order..
More
ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On July 26, 2016, the parties filed a stipulated protective order. They did not, however, indicate whether they were using a model protective order or a modified protective order as required by the Court's Standing Order. (See Judge Westmore's General Standing Order ¶ 11.)
Accordingly, the parties are ordered to submit, within 7 days of this order, (a) a declaration stating that the proposed order is identical to one of the model orders, (b) a declaration explaining each modification to the model order, along with a redline version comparing the proposed protective order with the model order, or (c) a declaration explaining why use of one of the model orders is not practicable. The declaration shall also explain why the parties have submitted a separate stipulation and proposed order regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
