Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mestayer v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., 3:15-cv-03645-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160802674 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT [Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint filed concurrently herewith] EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . ORDER The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Gloria A. Mestayer ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record, Clark Ovruchesky, and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. ("Capital One"), by and through its counsel of record, Johari N.
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Third Amended Complaint filed concurrently herewith]

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Gloria A. Mestayer ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record, Clark Ovruchesky, and Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. ("Capital One"), by and through its counsel of record, Johari N. Townes of Doll Amir & Eley LLP, to amend the date by which Capital One must respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, such that the responsive pleading shall now be August 31, 2016 (the "Stipulation"). The Stipulation is incorporated herein by reference. Good cause appearing thereon, the Court hereby orders as follows:

Capital One's time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is extended. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading on or before August 31, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer