Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KLAMUT v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, 15-cv-02132-MEJ. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160803809 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . The Court is in receipt of a letter from counsel for Defendants CHP Officers Nibecker and Wheeler requesting the Court set a telephonic hearing to enforce the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order, which requires the parties to meet and confer in person in an attempt to resolve any discovery disputes. Dkt. No. 46. Defendants' request indicates Plaintiff has not responded to a variety of their discovery requests and
More

ORDER FOR PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER

The Court is in receipt of a letter from counsel for Defendants CHP Officers Nibecker and Wheeler requesting the Court set a telephonic hearing to enforce the undersigned's Discovery Standing Order, which requires the parties to meet and confer in person in an attempt to resolve any discovery disputes. Dkt. No. 46. Defendants' request indicates Plaintiff has not responded to a variety of their discovery requests and Plaintiff's counsel has not responded to defense counsel's efforts to meet and confer. Id.

In light of the foregoing, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer in person or by video-teleconference by August 9, 2016. If unable to resolve the dispute, the parties shall draft a joint letter in compliance with paragraph 2 of the Discovery Standing Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer