CONNALLY v. STAHL, 15-cv-05639-MEJ. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160805841
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2016
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restor
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restore..
More
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed after passage of ninety (90) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
