Elawyers Elawyers

Freeman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 3:16-cv-03790-RS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160809756 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2016
Summary: EX PARTE STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION OF DEFENDANT QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, SET FOR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The interested parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows: Whereas, Plaintiff Neva Freeman filed and noticed a Motion to Remand and Motion for Preliminary Injunction for hearing on September 1, 2016; and Whereas, on July 27, 2016, Defendant Quality Loan Service Corpo
More

EX PARTE STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION OF DEFENDANT QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, SET FOR HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2016

The interested parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

Whereas, Plaintiff Neva Freeman filed and noticed a Motion to Remand and Motion for Preliminary Injunction for hearing on September 1, 2016; and

Whereas, on July 27, 2016, Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation filed and noticed a Motion to Dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Neva Freeman on or about July 27, 2016, for hearing on September 8, 2016; and

Whereas, Defendant Wells Fargo filed its Motion to Dismiss on or about July 28, 2016 and set it for hearing on September 1, 2016, and

Whereas, on July 28, 2016, the Court continued the hearings on Plaintiff's Motions and Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to September 8, 2016; and

Whereas, by Stipulation and order thereon, the Court has altered the briefing schedule for the parties in the Plaintiff's Motions and Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion, such that the Oppositions of the parties to those motions will be due on August 18, 2016, and the Replies to the same will be due on August 25, 2016; and

Whereas, the parties hereto desire to alter the briefing schedule for Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation to the same schedule; and

Whereas, no prior request has been made on these grounds and this Stipulation will not impact any dates on the Court's calendar,

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation's is continued to August 18, 2016, and any Reply to the Opposition is due on August 25, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer