Nechaldas v. Dialysis Newco, Inc., 4:15-cv-03322-EMC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160809788
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ proposed ] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Janet Nechaldas and Defendant Dialysis Newco Inc., jointly stipulate that the Complaint and all claims against Defendant be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. [ proposed ] order PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint and al
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ proposed ] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Janet Nechaldas and Defendant Dialysis Newco Inc., jointly stipulate that the Complaint and all claims against Defendant be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. [ proposed ] order PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint and all..
More
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Janet Nechaldas and Defendant Dialysis Newco Inc., jointly stipulate that the Complaint and all claims against Defendant be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
[proposed] order
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint and all of her claim against Defendant DIALYSIS NEWCO INC., are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
