Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HAHN v. CITY OF CARLSBAD, 15cv2007-DMS-BGS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160816751 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS BERNARD G. SKOMAL , Magistrate Judge . On August 2, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for In Camera Review of Confidential Documents. ( See ECF No. 54.) The parties in essence have done an end run around the Court's chambers' rules regarding discovery disputes. The Court only agrees to review documents In Camera after all the discovery procedures have been complied with, including the proper
More

ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

On August 2, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for In Camera Review of Confidential Documents. (See ECF No. 54.) The parties in essence have done an end run around the Court's chambers' rules regarding discovery disputes. The Court only agrees to review documents In Camera after all the discovery procedures have been complied with, including the proper propounding of documents requests, the filing of appropriate privilege log and following the procedures set forth in Hampton v. City of San Diego, 147 F.R.D. 227 (S.D. Cal. 1993) if applicable, and then following the procedures set forth for discovery disputes in the Court's chambers' rules. The parties have not done so. Therefore, their Joint Stipulation is DENIED without prejudice to bring the dispute after compliance with the pertinent Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's chambers' rules regarding discovery disputes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer