SYNOPSYS, INC. v. ATOPTECH, INC., C-13-2965 MMC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160817903
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: CHAMBERS COPIES MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On August 12, 2016, defendant ATopTech, Inc. ("ATopTech") filed its "Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding the Affirmative Defense of Equitable Estoppel." ATopTech has violated the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing to provide a chambers copy of said filing in single-sided format. See Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 2; see also Civil L.R. 3-4 (setti
Summary: ORDER RE: CHAMBERS COPIES MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On August 12, 2016, defendant ATopTech, Inc. ("ATopTech") filed its "Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding the Affirmative Defense of Equitable Estoppel." ATopTech has violated the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing to provide a chambers copy of said filing in single-sided format. See Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 2; see also Civil L.R. 3-4 (settin..
More
ORDER RE: CHAMBERS COPIES
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
On August 12, 2016, defendant ATopTech, Inc. ("ATopTech") filed its "Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding the Affirmative Defense of Equitable Estoppel." ATopTech has violated the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing to provide a chambers copy of said filing in single-sided format. See Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2; see also Civil L.R. 3-4 (setting forth the requirements for "papers presented for filing"); Civil L.R. 3-4(c)(2) (providing "text must appear on one side only").
Accordingly, ATopTech is hereby ORDERED to comply with this Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a single-sided chambers copy of the above-referenced document.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
