Filed: Aug. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU FOR FURTHER CONFERENCE; CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES THELTON E. HENDERSON , Senior District Judge . TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff MARK BURAS (BURAS) and Defendants CITY OF SANTA ROSA, a government entity; SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a government entity; BRETT SIWY; MICHAEL PAETZOLD (collectively, CITY), through their re
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU FOR FURTHER CONFERENCE; CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES THELTON E. HENDERSON , Senior District Judge . TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff MARK BURAS (BURAS) and Defendants CITY OF SANTA ROSA, a government entity; SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a government entity; BRETT SIWY; MICHAEL PAETZOLD (collectively, CITY), through their res..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE RYU FOR FURTHER CONFERENCE; CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL AND RELATED DATES
THELTON E. HENDERSON, Senior District Judge.
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff MARK BURAS (BURAS) and Defendants CITY OF SANTA ROSA, a government entity; SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a government entity; BRETT SIWY; MICHAEL PAETZOLD (collectively, CITY), through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
1. Counsel for defendants and plaintiff BURAS hereby request that the court re-assign this matter for further Mandatory Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu.
2. To conserve and potentially avoid expenses related to expert discovery and pre-trial preparation, and to foster settlement prospects, counsel for defendants and plaintiff BURAS hereby request either that the trial date in this matter be continued to a trial date commencing the second week of January 2017, or a date after that, or that the Court set a further Case Management Conference date.
3. Upon assignment of a continued trial date, all pre-trial dates shall be derived from the newly assigned trial date.
SO STIPULATED:
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the present trial date of October 18, 2016 is vacated, and a further Case Management Conference shall be held on November 7, 2016 at 1:30 PM, and the parties shall submit an updated Joint Statement ten days prior to the Conference. The parties shall contact Judge Ryu's chambers immediately to schedule a further settlement conference. If the case does not settle, the Court will set a new trial date at the CMC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.