Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY v. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 3:16-cv-04311-RS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160819781 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND RELATED MATTERS RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The following briefing and hearing schedule shall apply to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction: Deadline for Defendants' Opposition: September 13, 2016 Deadline for Plaintiffs' Reply:
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND RELATED MATTERS

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The following briefing and hearing schedule shall apply to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:

Deadline for Defendants' Opposition: September 13, 2016 Deadline for Plaintiffs' Reply: September 20, 2016 Hearing on motion for preliminary injunction: October 13, 2016 at 1:30 pm

2. No notice the Board of Equalization may send pursuant to Cal. Code Regs. tit. 19, § 2704(a), see also Cal. Gov't Code § 8574.32(b)(1), shall direct railroads operating in California to collect the SB 84 charge earlier than November 13, 2016.

3. Defendants' obligation to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is stayed until 40 days after the Court's decision on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

4. All discovery-related obligations and disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 are stayed until further order of this Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer