Filed: Aug. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their original Complaint on April 18, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated that responses to the Complaint would be due on June 1, 2016 (ECF 52); and WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference was originally schedule for July 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Court continued the Case Management Conference to
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their original Complaint on April 18, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated that responses to the Complaint would be due on June 1, 2016 (ECF 52); and WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference was originally schedule for July 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Court continued the Case Management Conference to A..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their original Complaint on April 18, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated that responses to the Complaint would be due on June 1, 2016 (ECF 52); and
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference was originally schedule for July 22, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Court continued the Case Management Conference to August 26, 2016 following the scheduling of a motion to dismiss hearing on July 22, 2016 (ECF 77); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation, the Court scheduled the deadline for Rule 26(a)(1) initial disclosures and Rule 26(f) report for August 19, 2016 (ECF 79); and
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Amended Complaint on August 12, 2016; and
WHEREAS, having reviewed the Amended Complaint, Defendants will be filing a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint and believe that a Case Management Conference is premature; and
WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications in the case other than those identified above, whether by stipulation or Court order;
WHEREAS, no other dates scheduled by the Court would be affected by the requested modification;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and request that the Court continue the Case Management Conference and set a briefing schedule for the anticipated motion to dismiss as follows:
• Motion to dismiss due on September 2, 2016;
• Opposition to motion to dismiss due on September 16, 2016;
• Reply in support of motion to dismiss due on September 30, 2016;
• Hearing on motion to dismiss on October 21, 2016;
• Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, Rule 26(f) Report, and Case Management Conference statements due on October 28, 2016; and
• Case Management Conference on November 4, 2016.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatories.
Dated: August 17, 2016 COOLEY LLP
/s/John C. Dwyer
_________________________________
John C. Dwyer (136533)
Attorneys for Defendant
AIRLINE TARIFF PUBLISHING COMPANY
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
