Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CHANEL, INC. v. HSIAO YIN FU, 3:16-cv-02259-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160822922 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties to this action, Plaintiff Chanel, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Hsaio Yin Fu ("Defendant"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following: On April 27, 2016, the Court entered a Case Management Conference Order that set an initial Case Management Conference for Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. (Dkt
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties to this action, Plaintiff Chanel, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Hsaio Yin Fu ("Defendant"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following:

On April 27, 2016, the Court entered a Case Management Conference Order that set an initial Case Management Conference for Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. (Dkt. No. 22.) On July 18, the Court approved the parties' joint stipulation and proposed order continuing the Case Management Conference to September 8, 2016. (Dkt. No. 43.) Defendant's counsel has been out of the country for several months, and recently informed Chanel's counsel that he will be out of the country on his honeymoon on September 8. (See August 17, 2016 Declaration of Ethan Jacobs ("Jacobs Decl."), ¶¶ 1-2).

Furthermore, the parties anticipate engaging in settlement discussions and scheduling a mediation at some point in the near future. (Id. ¶ 3). Accordingly, the parties respectfully request entry of an Order rescheduling the initial Case Management Conference from Thursday, September 8, 2016 to Thursday, September 22 at 9:30 a.m.

There has been one previous time modification in the case, when the Case Management Conference was continued in July at the parties' request. (Dkt. No. 43.) There are no events scheduled in the case at this time other than the Case Management Conference, so the requested continuance would not affect the schedule for the case.

SO STIPULATED:

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing's content and has authorized the filing.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 18th day of August, 2016 in San Francisco, California.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer