Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nelson v. Levy, 3:16-CV-3797 MMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160823644 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ] MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Defendant Jessica Jacobson filed a motion to dismiss on August 8, 2016; WHEREAS the Court continued the time and date for oral argument on that motion for September 16, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 24; WHEREAS Defendant Jessica Jacobson Plaintiff filed a notice continuing the hearing to September 23, 2016. Dkt. No. 25; and WHEREAS Plai
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER]

WHEREAS, the Defendant Jessica Jacobson filed a motion to dismiss on August 8, 2016;

WHEREAS the Court continued the time and date for oral argument on that motion for September 16, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Dkt. No. 24;

WHEREAS Defendant Jessica Jacobson Plaintiff filed a notice continuing the hearing to September 23, 2016. Dkt. No. 25; and

WHEREAS Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant Jessica Jacobson's motion to dismiss would have been due on August 22, 2016;

THEREFORE, the Parties do hereby STIPULATE as follows,

Plaintiffs will have until August 29, 2016 to file their Opposition to Jacobson's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants will have until September 12, 2016 to file a Reply. See August 22, 2016 Abe George Declaration.

Defendant Jacobson maintains that Plaintiffs do not meet Justice Chesney's rules for an enlargement of time, but for the sake of judicial economy and professional courtesy nonetheless stipulates to the aforesaid schedule. See August 22, 2016 Abe George Declaration.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the stipulation of the Parties and finding good cause therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs will have until August 29, 2016 to file their Opposition to Jacobson's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants will have until September 12, 2016 to file a Reply. 2. The hearing on the motion to dismiss is continued to September 30, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer