U.S. v. COHEN, CR 10-00547 CRB. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160826b19
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Defendant Samuel Cohen moves for a certificate of appealability from this Court's order denying his motion to dismiss his money laundering counts pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). The Court DENIES Defendant a certificate of appealability because he has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Nor has he demonstrated tha
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Defendant Samuel Cohen moves for a certificate of appealability from this Court's order denying his motion to dismiss his money laundering counts pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). The Court DENIES Defendant a certificate of appealability because he has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Nor has he demonstrated that..
More
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Defendant Samuel Cohen moves for a certificate of appealability from this Court's order denying his motion to dismiss his money laundering counts pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). The Court DENIES Defendant a certificate of appealability because he has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Nor has he demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Court's assessment of his motion debatable or wrong. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The clerk shall forward to the court of appeals the case file with this Order. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
