Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Donagal, CR-14-0285 JST. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160826b47 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING DATE FOR CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING AND SETTING NEW DATE FOR HEARING JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The United States of America, by its attorneys, Brian Stretch, United States Attorney, and Assistant United States Attorney ("AUSA") Kevin Barry, and defendant MICHAEL TOMADA, by his attorney, Peter Goodman, hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order requesting that the August 26, 2016, date currently set for the defendant to enter a new p
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING DATE FOR CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING AND SETTING NEW DATE FOR HEARING

The United States of America, by its attorneys, Brian Stretch, United States Attorney, and Assistant United States Attorney ("AUSA") Kevin Barry, and defendant MICHAEL TOMADA, by his attorney, Peter Goodman, hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order requesting that the August 26, 2016, date currently set for the defendant to enter a new plea in this matter be continued and that the change of plea hearing be reset for September 9, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. The parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following:

1. At the last calling of this case, the parties requested that the Probation Department prepare a Pre-Plea Report calculating defendant TOMADA's Criminal History Category ("CHC"). On August 19, 2016, USPO Jessica Goldsberry disclosed a Modified Presentence Investigation Report finding that defendant TOMADA had six criminal history points which placed him in CHC III.

2. With the information provided by USPO Goldsberry, the parties are attempting to finalize the terms of the Plea Agreement in this matter but it may need to be submitted and approved by AUSA Barry's Supervisor. The parties are therefore requesting that the change of plea hearing be continued for two weeks to accomplish that result.

3. The parties further stipulate and agree that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv) from August 26, 2016, to September 9, 2016, to ensure the parties have adequate time to prepare. The parties further stipulate and agree that the exclusion of time agreed to herein is in the interests of justice and will serve to ensure effective assistance of counsel for defendant TOMADA.

SO STIPULATED

ORDER VACATING DATE FOR CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING AND SETTING NEW DATE FOR HEARING

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the August 26, 2016, date currently set for a change of plea hearing in this matter be vacated and the matter be continued to September 9, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. for defendant TOMADA to change his plea. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv) from August 26, 2016, to September 9, 2016, in the interests of justice to ensure the parties have adequate time to finalize the terms of the disposition in this matter. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer