Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eberhardt v. Colvin, 3:16-cv-02658-JST. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160901864 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The parties stipulate to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will obtain additional evidence in the form of a medical consultative examination with a medical source statement; give further consideration to Plai
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF

The parties stipulate to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Upon remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) will obtain additional evidence in the form of a medical consultative examination with a medical source statement; give further consideration to Plaintiff's maximum residual functional capacity and provide appropriate rationale with specific references to evidence of record in support of the assessed limitations; obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence; address the missing page in Exhibit 2F/24; offer Plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take any further action needed to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer