Filed: Sep. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom Corporation, hereinafter " GeoVector ," or " Plaintiff ,") and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (" SEC "), Samsung International, Inc. (" SII "), Samsung Research America, Inc. (" SRA "), and Samsung Elect
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom Corporation, hereinafter " GeoVector ," or " Plaintiff ,") and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (" SEC "), Samsung International, Inc. (" SII "), Samsung Research America, Inc. (" SRA "), and Samsung Electr..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff GeoVector Corporation (originally CritiCom Corporation, hereinafter "GeoVector," or "Plaintiff,") and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("SEC"), Samsung International, Inc. ("SII"), Samsung Research America, Inc. ("SRA"), and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. ("SEA") (collectively, "Samsung," or "Defendants") by their respective counsel.1
RECITALS
1. On May 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed its Original Complaint in the instant action.
2. On May 6, 2016, the Court scheduled the initial case management conference for August 3, 2016.
3. On May 13, 2016, Plaintiff served SEA with the Summons and Original Complaint.
4. On June 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint.
5. Plaintiff agreed to an extension of time for the Defendants to respond to the Complaint by 90 days in exchange for SEC's agreement to accept or otherwise waive service of the Summons and Complaint such that the Defendants' response to the First Amended Complaint is due on the same date.
6. On June 13, 2016, the Honorable Donna M. Ryu signed a Stipulation and Order that contained the 90-day extension and continued the Case Management Conference from August 3, 2016 to September 21, 2016.
7. On September 2, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint in Part (the "Motion").
8. For the past two weeks, lead counsel for Plaintiff, Mr. Jack Russo, has been ill and is overseas.
STIPULATION
In light of Mr. Russo's illness, the parties agree that time schedule for the Opposition and Reply on the Motion be modified as follows:
A. The Deadline to File the Opposition to the Motion be changed from September 16, 2016 to September 23, 2016:
B. The Deadline to file the Reply in Support of the Motion be changed from September 23, 2016 to October 7, 2016.
ORDER
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint in Part shall be filed no later than September 23, 2016.
Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint in Part shall be filed no later than October 7, 2016.
