Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Opperman v. Path, Inc., 13-CV-00453-JST. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160926993 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST Pirozzi v. Apple Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST (collectively, the "Related Actions") JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiffs and Defendant Gowalla, Inc. ("Gowalla") (collectively the "Parties") hereby stipulate to the following partial stay in this case, and respectfully request that the Court issue the requested scheduling order.
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING

Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST Pirozzi v. Apple Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST (collectively, the "Related Actions")

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Plaintiffs and Defendant Gowalla, Inc. ("Gowalla") (collectively the "Parties") hereby stipulate to the following partial stay in this case, and respectfully request that the Court issue the requested scheduling order.

The Ninth Circuit is currently considering Defendant Apple Inc.'s Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 23(f), filed on July 29, 2016. The issues in that Petition may have a material impact on the outcome of a motion for class certification against Gowalla. In the interests of judicial economy, the Parties have agreed to postpone the current briefing and hearing schedule with respect to Plaintiffs' motion for class certification against Gowalla, set forth in ECF number 789.

Gowalla and Plaintiffs are presently engaged in bilateral settlement discussions and intend to continue those discussions. The Parties have also agreed to engage in joint mediation in an attempt to settle this matter, in which Gowalla will participate if bilateral settlement discussions have not succeeded. To allow the Parties to focus on the success of settlement discussions, the Parties have agreed that all current deadlines in this action should be vacated, and all fact discovery stayed.

In place of those deadlines, the Parties propose that a joint management statement be filed within 14 days of the Ninth Circuit's response to Apple's Petition proposing a revised schedule that allows sufficient time for the Parties to complete their mediation and settlement discussions. The Parties further propose that in no event shall Gowalla have less than 30 days from the revised scheduling order to oppose Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and in no event shall the Parties have less than three months from the revised scheduling order to complete fact discovery.

ATTESTATION

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories listed above.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Stipulation between Plaintiffs and Gowalla is GRANTED as follows:

The current scheduling order is vacated.

Plaintiffs and Gowalla will submit a case management statement within 14 days of the Ninth Circuit's response to Apple's Petition that complies with their stipulation set forth above.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer