GUZMAN v. MADISON VINEYARD HOLDINGS, LLC, 3:16-CV-00404 JST. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160927b18
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2016
Summary: PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT'S JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Carmen Guzman and Defendant Madison Vineyard Holdings, LLC dba Jamieson Ranch Vineyards through their respective counsel of records, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of
Summary: PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT'S JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Carmen Guzman and Defendant Madison Vineyard Holdings, LLC dba Jamieson Ranch Vineyards through their respective counsel of records, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of s..
More
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT'S JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Carmen Guzman and Defendant Madison Vineyard Holdings, LLC dba Jamieson Ranch Vineyards through their respective counsel of records, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs of suit.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned matter be, and hereby is, dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs in connection with this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
