MARTINEZ v. MACY'S, INC., 16-cv-01648-NC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161003933
Visitors: 44
Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The Court ORDERS plaintiff Athena Martinez to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as to defendant Macy's Inc. who appears to not have been served in compliance with the Court's prior order, dkt. no. 11, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Proof of service or a status report must be submitted by October 7, 2016. Additionally, by the same date, defendants must file a corporate disclosure statement. Fed. R. Civ.
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The Court ORDERS plaintiff Athena Martinez to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as to defendant Macy's Inc. who appears to not have been served in compliance with the Court's prior order, dkt. no. 11, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Proof of service or a status report must be submitted by October 7, 2016. Additionally, by the same date, defendants must file a corporate disclosure statement. Fed. R. Civ. P..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
The Court ORDERS plaintiff Athena Martinez to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as to defendant Macy's Inc. who appears to not have been served in compliance with the Court's prior order, dkt. no. 11, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Proof of service or a status report must be submitted by October 7, 2016.
Additionally, by the same date, defendants must file a corporate disclosure statement. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
