Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RANA v. GU, C 16-05589 WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161006d17 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2016
Summary: SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On July 17, defendants served plaintiffs with notice that their tenancy in their home would be terminated effective September 19 due to plaintiffs' decision to operate a "home daycare." Plaintiffs notified defendants they cancelled their plans and requested that their tenancy be reinstated. On August 10, defendants extended the termination date for plaintiffs' tenancy to October 10. On September 30,
More

SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

On July 17, defendants served plaintiffs with notice that their tenancy in their home would be terminated effective September 19 due to plaintiffs' decision to operate a "home daycare." Plaintiffs notified defendants they cancelled their plans and requested that their tenancy be reinstated. On August 10, defendants extended the termination date for plaintiffs' tenancy to October 10.

On September 30, after several exchanges between counsel for both sides, plaintiffs commenced this action, claiming that defendants' conduct violated federal and state fair housing laws and demanding that defendants reinstate the tenancy.

On the evening of October 5, nearly a week after commencing this action and nearly four months after receiving the initial notice that their tenancy would be terminated, plaintiffs made an "Ex Parte Emergency Motion For Temporary Restraining Order" (Dkt. No. 15).

The Court is unwilling to grant ex parte relief, particularly in light of plaintiffs' significant delay in making the instant motion. A hearing on plaintiffs' motion is hereby SET for TOMORROW, OCTOBER 6, AT 3:00 P.M., in Courtroom 8 on the 19th floor of the federal courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. The summons, complaint, motion for a temporary restraining order, and all supporting declarations must be served on defendants by

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer