Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DYTCH v. DOMINGUEZ, 3:15-cv-05151-SI. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161013868 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2016
Summary: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Albert Dytch ("Plaintiff"), wishes to dismiss Defendants, Francisco Coello Dominguez dba Mariscos El Tata Al Estilo Sinaloa; and Eloisa Sanchez dba Mariscos El Tata Al Estilo Sinaloa ("Defendants") from the above-captioned action pursuant to settlement with Defendants; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has been unable to obtain a signed stipulation from Defendants for dismissal pursuant to
More

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Albert Dytch ("Plaintiff"), wishes to dismiss Defendants, Francisco Coello Dominguez dba Mariscos El Tata Al Estilo Sinaloa; and Eloisa Sanchez dba Mariscos El Tata Al Estilo Sinaloa ("Defendants") from the above-captioned action pursuant to settlement with Defendants;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has been unable to obtain a signed stipulation from Defendants for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);

WHEREAS, no cross-claim, counter-claim or third-party claim has been filed in this action;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), that Defendants be dismissed from the above-captioned action with prejudice.

ORDER

Pursuant to the request of Plaintiff, and no cross-claim, counter-claim or third-party claim having been filed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, Francisco Coello Dominguez dba Mariscos El Tata Al Estilo Sinaloa; and Eloisa Sanchez dba Mariscos El Tata Al Estilo Sinaloa be dismissed from the above-captioned action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer