Filed: Oct. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 230 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff PNY Technologies, Inc.'s ("PNY" "Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge," filed October 12, 2016, in which PNY seeks relief from the "Order Regarding September 30, 2016 Discovery Letter," filed October 3, 2016. Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, for the reaso
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 230 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff PNY Technologies, Inc.'s ("PNY" "Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge," filed October 12, 2016, in which PNY seeks relief from the "Order Regarding September 30, 2016 Discovery Letter," filed October 3, 2016. Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, for the reason..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 230
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff PNY Technologies, Inc.'s ("PNY" "Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge," filed October 12, 2016, in which PNY seeks relief from the "Order Regarding September 30, 2016 Discovery Letter," filed October 3, 2016.
Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, for the reason that PNY has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider magistrate judge's order where it has been shown to be "clearly erroneous or contrary to law").
IT IS SO ORDERED.
