Filed: Oct. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DATE TO SUBMIT EXPERT REPORTS AND DATE FOR DPPS TO RESPOND TO MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The undersigned Mitsubishi Electric Defendants and the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ("DPPs") have conferred and through their counsel, and subject to the Court's approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS on May 3, 2016, this Court set a number
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DATE TO SUBMIT EXPERT REPORTS AND DATE FOR DPPS TO RESPOND TO MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The undersigned Mitsubishi Electric Defendants and the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ("DPPs") have conferred and through their counsel, and subject to the Court's approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS on May 3, 2016, this Court set a number o..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DATE TO SUBMIT EXPERT REPORTS AND DATE FOR DPPS TO RESPOND TO MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
The undersigned Mitsubishi Electric Defendants and the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ("DPPs") have conferred and through their counsel, and subject to the Court's approval, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS on May 3, 2016, this Court set a number of pre-trial schedules in this case. As is relevant to this stipulation, the Court directed the Mitsubishi Electric Defendants to submit rebuttal reports of their expert witnesses on October 7, 2016. (Dkt. 4628, docketed May 4, 2016);
WHEREAS on September 28, 2016, the Court directed any parties, notably the DPPs, wishing to respond to the Mitsubishi Electric Defendants' Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Special Master (Dkt. 4802), to do so before October 7, 2016 (Dkt. 4893);
WHEREAS the Court granted the parties' stipulation filed on October 3, 2016 extending the October 7, 2016 deadlines to October 21, 2016 (Dkt. 4920);
WHEREAS the Mitsubishi Electric Defendants and the DPPs continue to be engaged in settlement discussions, and have made additional, substantial progress in resolving their dispute. They believe that they will be able to resolve this case, such that it will be unnecessary for the Mitsubishi Electric Defendants to submit expert reports or the DPPs to respond to the Mitsubishi Electric Defendants' objections to the Special Master's Proposed Order;
WHEREAS the parties currently anticipate that they will make substantial progress in resolving this dispute by November 21, 2016;
WHEREAS the parties further believe that progress will be advanced in this case if the Court schedules the case for a status conference, the parties request that this matter be added to the agenda of the previously scheduled hearing in this case on November 17, 2016 such that the parties can advise the Court at that time whether the matter has been resolved and they may obtain the Court's guidance if necessary;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the undersigned plaintiffs and defendants, and subject to the Court's approval, that:
1. The October 21, 2016 deadlines shall be extended to November 21, 2016;
2. This matter may be added to the agenda of the November 17, 2016 status hearing in this case for the parties to advise the Court of the status of the case and obtain the Court's guidance if necessary.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
