Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Saravia v. Dynamex, Inc., 3:14-CV-05003-WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161017a22 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR NON-SUBSTANTIVE MODIFICATION OF ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS [DKT NO. 206] WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, hereby respectfully submit the following joint stipulation to modify the Court's Order on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 206.) Specifically, the parties stipulate to confo
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR NON-SUBSTANTIVE MODIFICATION OF ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS CERTAIN OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS [DKT NO. 206]

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, hereby respectfully submit the following joint stipulation to modify the Court's Order on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 206.) Specifically, the parties stipulate to conform the spelling of the names of four of the Opt-In Plaintiffs subject to the Order to the spelling of their names on the Opt-In Consent to Join forms previously submitted to the Court.

The Parties propose the following corrections, and respectfully request that the Court modify the Order accordingly:

Name in Order Name on Opt-In Consent Form Somching Kapkitkajon (Dkt. No. 206 Somching Lapkitkajon (Dkt. Nos. 115-at at 3:7, 8:22) 3 at Exh. 139; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 10:11) Manjit Sing Manjit Singh (Dkt. Nos. 115-3 at Exh. (Dkt. No. 206 at 3:14, 8:24) 146; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 10:23) Amrit Sing Amrit Pal Singh (Dkt. Nos. 115-3 at (Dkt. No. 206 at 3:13, 8:23) Exh. 141; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 10:18) Jasbir Sing Jasbir Singh (Dkt Nos. 115-3 at Exh. (Dkt. No. 206 at 3:13, 8:23) 142; 172-2 at 2:11-12, 195 at 10:19)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

The names used in the order dated September 30, 2016 (Dkt. No. 206) are hereby modified as set forth above.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer