Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KHN SOLUTIONS INC. v. VERTISENSE INC., 3:16-cv-00962-HSG. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161017a33 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff KHN Solutions Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Vertisense Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively the "Parties") by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order extending the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant requests a brief one-day extension to provide additional ti
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff KHN Solutions Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Vertisense Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively the "Parties") by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order extending the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

Defendant requests a brief one-day extension to provide additional time to investigate the factual allegations for the purpose of either admitting or denying them. The parties have previously stipulated to one time modification in this case: an October 7, 2016 stipulation to continue the Initial Case Management Conference from October 18, 2016 to October 25, 2016 due to Defendant's lead counsel's unavailability to appear for the original date because of a conflicting client commitment scheduled prior to this Court's scheduling of the Initial Case Management Conference. This time modification will not have an effect on the schedule for the case.

WHEREAS, Vertisense and KHN have mutually agreed to a one (1) court day extension of time for Vertisense to file an answer to the Complaint.

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that the time in which Vertisense may answer the Complaint is extended for one (1) court day, from Friday, October 14, 2016 to October 17, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Timothy C. Saulsbury, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer